GENETIC TESTING MALPRACTICE
PRENATAL SCREENING
Prenatal screening for genetic disorders has become a mainstream part of obstetric practice. These screenings will show parents whether they have an increased risk of having a fetus that might be affected by a genetic disorder. It is sometimes recommended that parents that are at high risk of having a baby with a genetic disorder due to both parents being carriers, choose not to conceive together, and to consider using a donor if they wish to have children.
PRENATAL TESTING
Prenatal testing during pregnancy is designed to actually test the fetus to see there is a genetic disorder present. Unfortunately, the testing is not 100% accurate and there are many false negatives and false positives that occur, leaving parents with difficult decisions. A false negative could result in a baby being born with a genetic disorder, and a false negative could cause the termination of a healthy fetus. This leaves parents with difficult decisions, and has given rise to a large number of lawsuits for wrongful abortion and wrongful birth.
AMNIOCENTESIS
Amniocentesis is the most accurate test, and is recommended for women over the age of 35. Testing can be done early, if requested, and if there is a family history of genetic disorders. It is usually performed between 14 and 20 weeks, and involves taking a sample of the amniotic fluid through a needle. This test is more accurate than others, but still has some percentage of false positives and negatives.
NEGLIGENCE
In addition to the flaws inherent to testing that if performed properly, there is sometimes negligence in the testing process. There is an expectation that genetic testing will be done properly, that the correct tests will be given, that the laboratory will perform the tests properly and that the doctors will interpret the results correctly. This is when families that that suffered with a wrongful birth should contact an experienced genetic malpractice attorney.
These are some situations from recent cases where the expectation of proper testing was not correct:
- Failure to offer genetic counseling to a family
- Failure to provide appropriate prenatal testing
- Errors by the laboratory
- Doctors did not accurately interpret results
- Medical professional failing to carry out orders
FAILURE TO OFFER GENETIC COUNSELING
Some younger mothers may decide to have testing based on their family history, and to test early in the pregnancy. Those decisions should be made with the benefit of genetic counseling. If no testing is done, and a baby is born with a genetic disorder, the failure of the medical office to recommend it, will present serious liability. Genetic counseling is a very important part of the process as informed consent must be obtained for the decision to either terminate or continue a pregnancy in light of the information that the testing provides. Parents must be counseled about the impact of a genetic disorder on a person’s health, and also about the statistics of false positives and negatives. Failure to offer this counseling leaves the medical profesionals vulnerable to a lawsuit, should the decision that was made by the parents, turn out to be a bad one.
FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE GENETIC TESTING
Testing must be offered to all mothers based on the results of their genetic counseling, their health history and their age. Failure to arrange for this testing, should a baby be born with a genetic disorder, would clearly be malpractice. The testing must also be appropriate, if a mother that is under 35 is given an amniocentesis that causes a spontaneous abortion with a good reason for having the testing done, the doctor can be liable for this inappropriate testing.
ERRORS AT THE LABORATORY
Human error can play a part in any disaster, and errors at laboratories are common. Sometimes the wrong sample is tested or the beaker is contaminated. These mistakes can cause false positives or negatives regarding the health of a fetus. When this happens the laboratory is obviously liable, but the doctors can also be responsible if they based their decision solely on the testing, and did not apply common sense that might be needed, such as checking the patient’s history.
DOCTORS DID NOT CORRECTLY INTERPRET THE RESULTS
Test results must be interpreted by a doctor, and sometimes they are not interpreted correctly. It could be that the results were written on the wrong patient’s chart or that the doctor was not familiar enough with the testing and the disorders. This gives rise to liability should a decision be made to terminate a pregnancy or a pregnancy continues with an unexpected result.
WRONGFUL ABORTION
An evolving area of the law surrounds cases where negligence is alleged that caused them to terminate a pregnancy with a health fetus. This loss of a fetus can be actionable where the decision was based the wrong information. These cases often turn on the psychological and emotional harm that the family feels when they find out that they have terminated a healthy pregnancy.
WRONGFUL BIRTH
These sad cases are for children who were born with devastating diseases that could have been diagnosed with genetic testing very early in the pregnancy. The quality of life for these children can be close to non-existent, and the parents must suffer through this anguish and experience economic loss due to the astronomical cost of caring for these severely disabled children. We understand that this is a serious issue, and that not all parents might elect to end a pregnancy no matter the testing results are, but parents should be given the option of testing, and the testing should be done correctly to determine what genetic problems a fetus might have. Some genetic problems cause disabilities that might cause a child to have a disability such as Down’s Syndrome or Dwarfism that might make their lives more difficult, but with proper support, well worth living. There are other genetic problems that are so devastating that there is virtually no quality of life. That’s when you might consider bringing an action for wrongful birth with a genetic malpractice attorney. If your family is living with the aftermath of wrongful birth, you owe it to yourselves to contact a genetic medical malpractice attorney for a consultation.
Art Builds Communities
Art does not arrive fully formed. It is built—collectively, physically, in shared space. Before it appears on a street or in a march, it appears in conversation, in planning sessions, in rooms where people cut, paint, argue, revise, and keep going. This process is not secondary to the work. It is the work. Community is strengthened not only by what art represents, but by how it is made. An art build gathers people who might not otherwise meet. It gives them a common task, a shared visual language, and a reason to stay in the room together long enough for trust to form. The result is more than objects. It is continuity. In preparation for the next No Kings march, a large-scale art build is underway—one that treats visual presence as essential, not decorative. Signs, symbols, and constructed forms are being developed with the understanding that they will be carried by many hands, seen from many distances, and read in motion. This kind of work demands clarity, durability, and collective authorship. It is designed to be used. What happens [...]
Art as Power
Art is a form of power that operates through images rather than decree. It shapes perception, organizes memory, and gives structure to experiences that resist easy narration. Long before it persuades, art reorients: it trains attention, alters scale, and determines what is allowed to remain visible. My own work begins from this premise. Images are not neutral, and symbols are never incidental. They accumulate meaning through repetition, circulation, and use—through being carried, held, worn, or encountered unexpectedly. Over time, certain forms insist on returning. A flower becomes a sign of refusal rather than ornament. A future date becomes a horizon rather than a prediction. These are not abstractions; they are working tools. Throughout history, images have done work that laws and speeches cannot. They have carried dissent across borders, encoded refusal under regimes of surveillance, and preserved ways of seeing that institutions sought to erase. Art does not simply reflect power; it negotiates with it, absorbs its pressure, and—at times—outlasts it. Protest art makes this dynamic explicit. It demands clarity without simplification, endurance without stasis. This writing approaches art [...]
Executive Order – Jan 6 (Speculative)
SUMMARY January 20, 2029 President Orders Preservation and Public Access to the Historical Record of the January 6 Attack on American Democracy Today, the President signed an Executive Order directing the preservation, organization, and lawful public accessibility of the historical and judicial record related to the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol. The Order affirms that while presidential pardons resolve criminal liability, they do not erase historical facts, judicial findings, or the public record. The initiative is designed to safeguard democratic memory, ensure transparency, and support civic education—without imposing punishment, stigma, or retaliation against any individual. PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEJanuary 20, 2029 President Signs Executive Order to Preserve January 6 Historical Record The President today signed an Executive Order establishing a comprehensive, non-partisan effort to preserve and make accessible the historical and judicial record of the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol. The Order directs the Department of Justice and the National Archives to preserve court opinions, trial records, sworn testimony, and other lawfully public documents arising from the prosecutions of January [...]
Executive Order – East Wing Restoration (Speculative)
SUMMARY January 20, 2029 President Orders Removal of Unauthorized State Ballroom and Restoration of the White House East Wing Today, the President signed an Executive Order directing the complete demolition of the recently completed White House State Ballroom and the reconstruction of the historic East Wing. The order restores essential presidential, public, and security functions eliminated by the East Wing’s demolition and affirms that the White House is a national trust held for institutional continuity—not personal legacy. © 2025 Alyce Wittenstein. All Rights Reserved. Project 2029 and all associated text, structure, and policy formulations are original copyrighted works. No portion may be reproduced, adapted, translated, or distributed without express written permission, except for brief quotations with attribution. PRESS RELEASE WASHINGTON — The President today signed an Executive Order mandating the removal of the newly completed White House State Ballroom and the full restoration of the White House East Wing to its historic footprint and function. The East Wing, first constructed in 1902 and expanded in 1942, served as the White House’s public and operational front. It housed the Office [...]
Executive Order – Kennedy Center (Speculative)
SUMMARY January 20, 2029 Today, the President signed an Executive Order restoring the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to its lawful name, memorial status, and independent governance. The Order voids unauthorized renaming actions taken on December 18, 2025, reaffirms congressional intent, and restores the Center as a national cultural institution held in trust for the American people—not as a vehicle for personal or political legacy. FULL EXECUTIVE ORDER TEXT [PASTE YOUR FULL EO TEXT HERE — unchanged] PRESS RELEASE WASHINGTON — The President today signed an Executive Order restoring the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to its proper legal name, memorial status, and governance structure. The Kennedy Center was established by Congress as a living memorial to President John F. Kennedy and was never intended to serve as a platform for personal branding or political self-memorialization. Actions taken in December 2025 to rename the institution were undertaken without congressional authorization and contrary to the Center’s founding statute. This Executive Order reaffirms that national cultural institutions are held in public trust and exist for [...]
Introducing Project 2029
Project 2029 began as a deliberate shift in how I use imagination. More than thirty-five years ago, I made dystopian films that imagined political and social futures shaped by fear, institutional failure, and concentration of power. At the time, those futures felt exaggerated—useful as warnings, but safely distant from reality. Over time, many of the conditions those films explored stopped feeling speculative and began to feel familiar. That experience changed how I think about storytelling and political imagination. If dystopian futures can move from fiction into lived experience, then imagination is not neutral. It shapes what people expect, accept, and resign themselves to. Project 2029 is a conscious decision to move in the opposite direction—to use imagination not to warn, but to build. Project 2029 is a speculative policy project built on a clear assumption: progressive Democrats win governing power in a decisive landslide and choose to govern decisively. The project does not argue for that outcome, respond to opponents, or engage in contemporary political debate. It begins after the election is over and the mandate is established. From [...]