About Alyce Wittenstein

Alyce Wittenstein is a world class attorney, blogger and filmmaker. She began working at the firm in 1985 as a managing paralegal, learning all the practices and procedures of the firm from Mr. Wittenstein and the staff. From 1995-1998, she attended CUNY Law School where she made a mark as a teaching assistant for Civil Rights leader Haywood Burns. She founded a Human Rights Delegation to Haiti and studied Constitutional Law with Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Working at the Equal Opportunity Employment Commision (EEOC), she learned a great deal about Employment Discrimination matters. She brought her knowledge of the Personal Injury practice and her passion for Civil Rights to the firm when she was admitted to the Bar in 1999. In 2000, she became a partner and the firm name was changed to Wittenstein & Wittenstein, Esqs. PC.

What Is an Art Build?

How Art Builds Strengthen Protest Movements Through Visual Language

An art build is a gathering that happens before a protest, march, or rally to create large-scale, coordinated visual elements that will be deployed together in public space. Rather than focusing on a single object, an art build brings people together to construct a shared visual language—one that can hold across streets, crowds, architecture, and cameras. Some kinds of political expression can’t be made by one person, at one table, in one afternoon; they require planning, shared labor, and agreement about how a movement wants to appear when it shows up.

Art builds are a core practice in contemporary protest movements, especially in New York City, where demonstrations unfold across large, complex urban spaces and are documented instantly through photography, video, and social media—a pattern that also appears clearly in Washington, DC, Boston, Los Angeles, and Portland.

Visual Language, Built Collectively

When a movement incorporates art builds, it strengthens how clearly the action registers in public space. Repeated colors, forms, and scale make the message readable across distance, crowds, and media coverage. Instead of each element competing for attention, the visuals work together so the action is understood at a glance and remembered afterward. Over time, these repeated choices become recognizable. The message doesn’t need to be reintroduced each time—it accumulates.

How Protest Art Works at Scale

In New York City, wide avenues and dense crowds reward clarity. In Manhattan No Kings actions, large yellow banners span curb to curb, while vertical signage and crossed-out crown symbols repeat above the crowd. The same colors and forms appear again and again. The message doesn’t evolve from sign to sign; it builds density through consistency.

In New York City actions organized in Queens, that consistency is paired with place-specific imagery. Large front banners name the borough directly, while recurring illustrated elements—most notably the Resist Flower—appear at scale and are elevated above the crowd, serving as visual anchors. These images carry identity as much as text. The action can be recognized without reading anything at all.

In Washington, DC, art builds often take a performative form. Wearable sculpture, matching uniforms, and chained figures move together through institutional space. Meaning is carried through costume, movement, and choreography rather than banners. The group reads as a single constructed scene in motion.

In Boston, protest imagery draws on regional symbols. Oversized lobster costumes—immediately legible as New England—carry the message through form first, text second. Place and politics arrive together, without explanation.

In Los Angeles and along California’s coastline, art builds expand to landscape scale. On beaches, hundreds of people arrange themselves to spell messages large enough to be read from the air. Bodies become material. The message fully exists only from a distant vantage point, designed for aerial photography and wide circulation.

In Portland, long-running actions have produced distinctive, repeatable imagery that travels beyond the city itself. Symbols like the inflatable frog appear across multiple actions and formats, becoming familiar through repetition. The image carries meaning through use and reuse, signaling shared participation rather than centralized authorship.

Art Builds and Poster-Making Workshops

Poster-making workshops matter. They invite participation, help people find their voice, and are often how individuals first enter a movement.

Art builds serve a different function. They are used when a movement wants to remain legible across distance, hold together visually in large crowds, read clearly in photographs and video, and stay recognizable from one action to the next. The work is large, heavy, repetitive, and time-consuming. It takes many hands because the objects—and the images—cannot exist otherwise.

What Art Builds Do

Art builds are where movements take shape before they take the street. They are the moment when ideas stop being theoretical and become physical: banners that have to be lifted, images that have to be carried, forms that only work if people move together. Through that shared labor, a movement makes decisions about scale, color, placement, and presence—decisions that determine how it will register once it enters public space.

What comes out of an art build is not just artwork. It is coordination and shared authorship, a collective commitment to showing up in a particular way. That commitment is what allows an action to read clearly across distance, across cities, and across time, even as the people involved change. Art builds keep reappearing because they solve a recurring, practical problem: how to make collective action visible, coherent, and intentional in environments that are crowded, noisy, and constantly mediated.

An art build is where that visibility is made—before anyone ever steps into the street.

What Is an Art Build?

Queens, Brooklyn, and the Geography of Resistance Art

Art movements are shaped by geography — not just aesthetics.

For decades, Brooklyn functioned as New York’s shorthand for experimental political art. That reputation was earned. Poster workshops, print collectives, underground presses, and radical galleries played a real role in anti-war organizing, labor movements, and later global justice actions.

But movements migrate.

Queens is where political art now intersects most directly with lived conditions. It is where organizers, immigrants, students, workers, and artists share space without insulation. The art is less polished, less ironic, and more accountable to consequence.

That shift mirrors global patterns. In cities worldwide, the most effective protest art emerges not from cultural centers, but from pressure points — places where policy is felt immediately, not abstractly.

Queens fits that profile.

Art builds here are not spectacles. They are preparatory acts. They happen before marches, before court dates, before elections. They create shared language across communities that may not share ideology but do share stakes.

RESIST FLOWER™ operates inside that ecosystem. It is intentionally simple, reproducible, and mobile. It does not require explanation to function. It does not belong to a single moment or event.

The shop exists because permanence requires resources. Historically, those resources came from institutions aligned with movements. Today, they must be generated differently — without compromising autonomy.

This is not art about resistance.
It is art embedded within it.

👉 The work sustains itself through the shop
https://www.etsy.com/shop/ResistFlower

Queens, Brooklyn, and the Geography of Resistance Art

Art Movements, Protest Lineage, and Why This Work Exists

Political art has never been ornamental. At its best, it has functioned as logistics, memory, and coordination — a parallel system of communication when official systems fail or turn hostile.

From the hand-printed posters of the U.S. Civil Rights era, to anti-apartheid graphics in South Africa, to the silk-screened iconography of May ’68 in Paris, visual language has repeatedly done three things movements require:
signal alignment, create cohesion, and make resistance visible at scale.

In the 1950s and 1960s, civil rights organizers did not treat posters, buttons, and printed materials as accessories. They were how people recognized one another. How messages traveled when mass media refused to carry them. How collective identity took shape across neighborhoods and states. Art was not commentary — it was infrastructure.

That lineage continues globally. The raised fist, the flower, the hand-lettered placard, the repeated symbol — these are not aesthetic coincidences. They are tools refined over decades because they work. They are easily reproduced, emotionally legible, and resistant to distortion.

New York City has always been a central node in that tradition.

Brooklyn has long carried the mythology: lofts, collectives, galleries, political poster shops, the fusion of art and radical politics. But that mythology often obscures the present reality.

Queens is where this work is now being actively built — across languages, generations, and class lines. Queens’ art culture is not extractive. It doesn’t rely on gatekeepers or institutional permission. It emerges from lived political conditions: immigration, labor, housing pressure, surveillance, and organizing that happens alongside everyday life.

That context matters.

RESIST FLOWER™ comes out of this tradition — not as nostalgia, but as adaptation. The flower is a historically loaded form. It has been used to signify mourning and refusal, peace and endurance, fragility and persistence. In protest movements, flowers have often appeared at moments when brute force power meets moral clarity — when violence is exposed rather than mirrored.

This work uses that language deliberately.

But it also recognizes a hard truth contemporary movements face: sustainability is structural, not emotional. Movements fail not because people stop caring, but because material support collapses. Funding dries up. Burnout sets in. Infrastructure disappears between moments of visibility.

That is where the shop comes in — not as “merch,” but as a continuation of movement practice.

Historically, protest art was produced collectively and distributed cheaply or freely, often subsidized by unions, churches, or movement organizations. Those structures are weaker now. The RESIST FLOWER™ shop exists to replace them — transparently and without intermediaries.

The art circulates.
The circulation generates resources.
Those resources fund organizing, art builds, and public action.

This is not new in spirit. It is new in form.

Buying the work is not symbolic support. It is participation in a long-standing model of how political art has always functioned — updated for contemporary conditions.

The flower does not ask for attention.
It assumes continuity.

👉 The RESIST FLOWER™ shop operates as movement infrastructure
https://www.etsy.com/shop/ResistFlower

Art Movements, Protest Lineage, and Why This Work Exists

EXECUTIVE–WORKER PAY ALIGNMENT ACT

SUMMARY

Executive–Worker Pay Alignment Act

The Executive–Worker Pay Alignment Act aligns increases in executive compensation with wage growth for workers at large employers. When a company increases total compensation for its highly paid executives, worker wages must increase by the same percentage during the same fiscal year. If executive compensation does not increase, the Act does not apply.

The Act does not set wages, mandate bonuses, or cap executive pay outright. It targets a specific driver of wage disparity: raising executive pay while leaving workers out. Executive compensation is treated as a connected system, preventing evasion through re-labeling, new executive hires at higher rates, equity restructuring, or compensation paid through affiliates.

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WASHINGTON — March 12, 2029 — Legislation introduced in Congress today would require large employers to align increases in executive compensation with wage growth for workers. Under the Executive–Worker Pay Alignment Act, companies that increase total compensation for highly paid executives must increase worker wages by the same percentage during the same fiscal year.

The bill does not set wages or cap executive pay. Instead, it applies only when executive compensation rises, preventing companies from increasing pay at the top while workers are left out. The Act treats executive compensation as a single system—covering salary, bonuses, equity, and other remuneration—and closes loopholes that allow compensation increases through reclassification or new executive hires. Supporters say the measure addresses wage disparity by ensuring executive rewards reflect shared economic outcomes rather than one-sided pay growth.

FULL BILL


EXECUTIVE–WORKER PAY ALIGNMENT ACT

A BILL

To require alignment between increases in executive compensation and worker wage growth at large employers, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Executive–Worker Pay Alignment Act.”

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

(a) Findings. Congress finds that—

  1. In recent decades, increases in executive compensation have far outpaced wage growth for workers.

  2. Compensation practices that permit executive pay increases without corresponding worker wage increases contribute to wage disparity and economic inequality.

  3. Corporations operating in the United States benefit from public infrastructure, legal protections, and economic systems supported by public investment.

  4. Aligning increases in executive compensation with worker wage growth promotes shared economic outcomes and long-term stability.

(b) Purpose.
The purpose of this Act is to align increases in executive compensation with worker wage growth, while preserving employer discretion over compensation decisions.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

  1. Covered Employer.
    Any for-profit corporation that employs more than 1,000 employees and reports annual gross revenue exceeding $500,000,000, and that operates in, sells into, or is listed on a United States financial exchange.

  2. Covered Executive.
    Any employee or officer whose total annual compensation exceeds the threshold for highly compensated employees under section 414(q) of the Internal Revenue Code.

  3. Total Executive Compensation.
    The aggregate value of all remuneration provided to a covered executive, including salary, bonuses, incentives, equity, deferred compensation, and compensation paid through affiliates or controlled subsidiaries.

  4. Workforce.
    All non-executive employees employed by a covered employer or its controlled subsidiaries.

  5. Median Worker Wage.
    The median annual wages of all non-executive employees within the workforce.

  6. Controlled Subsidiary.
    As defined in section 1563 of the Internal Revenue Code.

SEC. 4. WAGE ALIGNMENT REQUIREMENT.

(a) Triggering Event.
This section applies only in a fiscal year in which a covered employer increases total executive compensation.

(b) Worker Wage Condition.
A covered employer may not increase total executive compensation unless the median worker wage increased during the same fiscal year by the same percentage.

(c) Proportionality Requirement.
The percentage increase in executive compensation may not exceed the percentage increase in the median worker wage.

(d) Anti-Evasion Rule.
Increases include salary changes, bonuses, equity gains, compensation for newly hired executives, affiliate payments, or any restructuring that increases total remuneration.

SEC. 5. COMPLIANCE OPTIONS.

A covered employer complies by:

  1. Increasing worker wages by the same percentage as executive compensation;

  2. Holding executive compensation flat; or

  3. Redirecting excess compensation into worker wages, profit-sharing, or qualified benefit plans.

SEC. 6. DISCLOSURE AND RULEMAKING.

Covered employers shall disclose wage and compensation data annually to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC may issue rules to prevent evasion and standardize reporting.

SEC. 7. ENFORCEMENT.

Non-compliant compensation is non-deductible for tax purposes, subject to civil penalties equal to 200% of excess compensation, and must be clawed back and redistributed to workers or the Treasury.

SEC. 8. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act applies to the first full fiscal year following enactment.

EXECUTIVE–WORKER PAY ALIGNMENT ACT

Executive Order – Enforcement and Recovery of Unlawful Self-Enrichment from Public Office (Speculative)

SUMMARY

January 20, 2029

President Orders Enforcement and Recovery of Unlawful Self-Enrichment from Public Office

Today, the President signed an Executive Order directing the identification, disclosure, and recovery of profits derived from the misuse of public office for personal enrichment. The Order affirms that federal officials have always held office as fiduciaries of the public, and that personal profits obtained through licensing, branding, naming rights, or similar arrangements tied to official authority were never lawful.

The Order instructs federal agencies to enforce existing ethics, forfeiture, and unjust enrichment laws to recover improperly obtained funds for the public treasury. It clarifies ethical obligations long recognized in law and tradition, and restores the principle that public office may not be used as a commercial enterprise.

© 2025 Alyce Wittenstein. All Rights Reserved.
Project 2029 and all associated text, structure, and policy formulations are original copyrighted works.

PRESS RELEASE

WASHINGTON — The President today signed an Executive Order directing the federal government to identify and recover profits unlawfully obtained through the misuse of public office, reaffirming that public service has always carried a fiduciary duty to the American people.

The Order makes clear that personal income derived from licensing, branding, endorsements, naming rights, or other commercial arrangements dependent on the authority, title, or exposure of public office was never permitted under federal ethics law. Such profits, where identified, are subject to recovery under existing civil forfeiture, unjust enrichment, and ethics enforcement authorities.

Under the Order:

  • Federal agencies are directed to review past and present financial arrangements of covered officials to determine whether income was derived from the exploitation of public office.

  • The Office of Government Ethics, in coordination with the Department of Justice and the Treasury, is instructed to identify funds subject to recovery under existing law.

  • Where profits are determined to have been improperly obtained, agencies are authorized to pursue disgorgement, restitution, or other lawful remedies to return those funds to the public treasury.

  • The Order explicitly states that it does not create new penalties or retroactive sanctions, but enforces ethical obligations that have always governed public office.

The Administration emphasized that public office is a position of trust, not a profit center, and that financial gains obtained through the misuse of that trust cannot be legitimized by time or repetition.

“Public office was never for sale,” the President said. “This Order enforces a principle that has always been true: money taken through the abuse of public trust belongs to the public.”

The Order takes effect immediately.

Executive Order – Enforcement and Recovery of Unlawful Self-Enrichment from Public Office (Speculative)