NEW YORK CITY LIQUOR LIABILITY LAWYER
The Dram Shop laws were enacted to hold those that sell alcohol responsible for accidents and injuries that result from improper sales. This is a “strict liability” tort, which means that there is an “absolute duty” not to sell alcohol to certain categories of people. It is unlawful to sell liquor to any person “actually or apparently” under age 21 or to any person that is “visibly intoxicated.” This provides an additional source of recovery for victims of drunk drivers. These are not easy cases to prove, there must be a thorough investigation including interviewing witnesses. Sometimes the hiring practices of the establishment must be investigated along with all the other facts and circumstances. This is why hiring an experienced New York City liquor liability lawyer is so helpful in these cases.
This is what needs to be proven:
- Your accident was caused by a person that was intoxicated;
- The sale of the alcohol to the intoxicated person was unlawful. (Either “visibly intoxicated” or “actually or apparently” under 21)
- The alcohol sale contributed to the person’s intoxication (ie; they actually drank it.)
The hardest part to prove is that the person was “visibly intoxicated,” as this is a subjective standard. It might be necessary to find and interview patrons to testify as witnesses as it is unlikely that the employees at the establishment will testify against their employers. This is when an experienced New York City liquor liability attorney will be able to nuance the situation.
How to show a person was “visibly intoxicated”:
The word “dram” is an old-fashioned word for a small unit of alcohol. This law provides that it is the duty of businesses that serve alcohol to make sure they do so responsibly. Some ways to establish “visible intoxication” are:
- Slurred speech
- Very loud speech
- Inability to stand straight
- Glazed or “glassy” eyes
- Aggressive behavior or fighting
- Drooping eyelids
- Unfocused or lack of eye contact
Dram Shop liability also arises in cases of bar and nightclub assaults. When too much alcohol impedes inhibitions and causes aggressive behavior, an establishment can be held liable. The individual that caused your injuries and the bar, nightclub or restaurant are all responsible, but it is much more likely that the business will have insurance to cover this type of claim. If you have been injured due to a violation of the “Dram Shop” Act in New York City (Queens, Brooklyn and Kings County, The Bronx, Staten Island and Richmond County, Manhattan or New York County or Long Island, we will leave no stone unturned to get you the justice you deserve. Call New York City liquor liability lawyer Wittenstein & Wittenstein at 718-261-8114 for a free consultation.
NEW YORK CITY LIQUOR LIABILITY LAWYER
N.Y. General Obligations Law § 11-101.
(The “Dram Shop” Act)
Compensation for injury caused by the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor:
1. Any person who shall be injured in person, property, means of support, or otherwise by any intoxicated person, or by reason of the intoxication of any person, whether resulting in his death or not, shall have a right of action against any person who shall, by unlawful selling to or unlawfully assisting in procuring liquor for such intoxicated person, have caused or contributed to such intoxication; and in any such action such person shall have a right to recover actual and exemplary damages.
2. In case of the death of either party, the action or right of action given by this section shall survive to or against his or her executor or administrator, and the Amount so recovered by either a husband, wife or child shall be his or her sole and separate property.
3. Such action may be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction.
4. In any case where parents shall be entitled to such damages, either the father or mother may sue alone therefor, but recovery by one of such parties shall be a bar to suit brought by the other.
CREDIT(S)
(L.1963, c. 576, § 1; amended L.1980, c. 281, § 20.)
Queens Says No Kings: The Making of a Queens-Wide Resistance Coalition
Queens Says No Kings is a Queens-based activist coalition formed in late 2024 in direct response to the reelection of Donald Trump. From the beginning, it brought together leaders of existing Queens activist groups who understood that the political moment demanded coordination across neighborhoods and organizations, not isolated actions. What followed was not a smooth or linear process, but a sequence of actions, leadership transitions, and creative breakthroughs that reshaped how large-scale resistance organizing took form in Queens. Formation: Stop the Steal for Real (Late 2024) The coalition began in late 2024 under its original working name, Stop the Steal for Real. The name reflected a clear rejection of authoritarian narratives and a commitment to [...]
Community Is Not a Brand — It’s a Practice
Community doesn’t appear fully formed. It’s built through repetition, trust, and showing up when it would be easier not to. In Queens, community work rarely announces itself as something grand. It looks like folding tables carried out early in the morning. It looks like hand-lettered signs drying on the floor. It looks like people learning each other’s names slowly, sometimes awkwardly, over weeks and months. It looks like neighbors deciding that the conditions they’re living under are not inevitable — and that they’re willing to do something together. That kind of community doesn’t come from aesthetics or slogans. It comes from practice. Place Matters Community organizing is always shaped by where it happens. Queens is [...]
What Is an Art Build?
How Art Builds Strengthen Protest Movements Through Visual Language An art build is a gathering that happens before a protest, march, or rally to create large-scale, coordinated visual elements that will be deployed together in public space. Rather than focusing on a single object, an art build brings people together to construct a shared visual language—one that can hold across streets, crowds, architecture, and cameras. Some kinds of political expression can’t be made by one person, at one table, in one afternoon; they require planning, shared labor, and agreement about how a movement wants to appear when it shows up. Art builds are a core practice in contemporary protest movements, especially in New York City, [...]
Queens, Brooklyn, and the Geography of Resistance Art
Art movements are shaped by geography — not just aesthetics. For decades, Brooklyn functioned as New York’s shorthand for experimental political art. That reputation was earned. Poster workshops, print collectives, underground presses, and radical galleries played a real role in anti-war organizing, labor movements, and later global justice actions. But movements migrate. Queens is where political art now intersects most directly with lived conditions. It is where organizers, immigrants, students, workers, and artists share space without insulation. The art is less polished, less ironic, and more accountable to consequence. That shift mirrors global patterns. In cities worldwide, the most effective protest art emerges not from cultural centers, but from pressure points — places where policy [...]
Art Movements, Protest Lineage, and Why This Work Exists
Political art has never been ornamental. At its best, it has functioned as logistics, memory, and coordination — a parallel system of communication when official systems fail or turn hostile. From the hand-printed posters of the U.S. Civil Rights era, to anti-apartheid graphics in South Africa, to the silk-screened iconography of May ’68 in Paris, visual language has repeatedly done three things movements require:signal alignment, create cohesion, and make resistance visible at scale. In the 1950s and 1960s, civil rights organizers did not treat posters, buttons, and printed materials as accessories. They were how people recognized one another. How messages traveled when mass media refused to carry them. How collective identity took shape across neighborhoods [...]
EXECUTIVE–WORKER PAY ALIGNMENT ACT
SUMMARY Executive–Worker Pay Alignment Act The Executive–Worker Pay Alignment Act aligns increases in executive compensation with wage growth for workers at large employers. When a company increases total compensation for its highly paid executives, worker wages must increase by the same percentage during the same fiscal year. If executive compensation does not increase, the Act does not apply. The Act does not set wages, mandate bonuses, or cap executive pay outright. It targets a specific driver of wage disparity: raising executive pay while leaving workers out. Executive compensation is treated as a connected system, preventing evasion through re-labeling, new executive hires at higher rates, equity restructuring, or compensation paid through affiliates. PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE [...]