NEW YORK CITY LIQUOR LIABILITY LAWYER
The Dram Shop laws were enacted to hold those that sell alcohol responsible for accidents and injuries that result from improper sales. This is a “strict liability” tort, which means that there is an “absolute duty” not to sell alcohol to certain categories of people. It is unlawful to sell liquor to any person “actually or apparently” under age 21 or to any person that is “visibly intoxicated.” This provides an additional source of recovery for victims of drunk drivers. These are not easy cases to prove, there must be a thorough investigation including interviewing witnesses. Sometimes the hiring practices of the establishment must be investigated along with all the other facts and circumstances. This is why hiring an experienced New York City liquor liability lawyer is so helpful in these cases.
This is what needs to be proven:
- Your accident was caused by a person that was intoxicated;
- The sale of the alcohol to the intoxicated person was unlawful. (Either “visibly intoxicated” or “actually or apparently” under 21)
- The alcohol sale contributed to the person’s intoxication (ie; they actually drank it.)
The hardest part to prove is that the person was “visibly intoxicated,” as this is a subjective standard. It might be necessary to find and interview patrons to testify as witnesses as it is unlikely that the employees at the establishment will testify against their employers. This is when an experienced New York City liquor liability attorney will be able to nuance the situation.
How to show a person was “visibly intoxicated”:
The word “dram” is an old-fashioned word for a small unit of alcohol. This law provides that it is the duty of businesses that serve alcohol to make sure they do so responsibly. Some ways to establish “visible intoxication” are:
- Slurred speech
- Very loud speech
- Inability to stand straight
- Glazed or “glassy” eyes
- Aggressive behavior or fighting
- Drooping eyelids
- Unfocused or lack of eye contact
Dram Shop liability also arises in cases of bar and nightclub assaults. When too much alcohol impedes inhibitions and causes aggressive behavior, an establishment can be held liable. The individual that caused your injuries and the bar, nightclub or restaurant are all responsible, but it is much more likely that the business will have insurance to cover this type of claim. If you have been injured due to a violation of the “Dram Shop” Act in New York City (Queens, Brooklyn and Kings County, The Bronx, Staten Island and Richmond County, Manhattan or New York County or Long Island, we will leave no stone unturned to get you the justice you deserve. Call New York City liquor liability lawyer Wittenstein & Wittenstein at 718-261-8114 for a free consultation.
NEW YORK CITY LIQUOR LIABILITY LAWYER
N.Y. General Obligations Law § 11-101.
(The “Dram Shop” Act)
Compensation for injury caused by the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor:
1. Any person who shall be injured in person, property, means of support, or otherwise by any intoxicated person, or by reason of the intoxication of any person, whether resulting in his death or not, shall have a right of action against any person who shall, by unlawful selling to or unlawfully assisting in procuring liquor for such intoxicated person, have caused or contributed to such intoxication; and in any such action such person shall have a right to recover actual and exemplary damages.
2. In case of the death of either party, the action or right of action given by this section shall survive to or against his or her executor or administrator, and the Amount so recovered by either a husband, wife or child shall be his or her sole and separate property.
3. Such action may be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction.
4. In any case where parents shall be entitled to such damages, either the father or mother may sue alone therefor, but recovery by one of such parties shall be a bar to suit brought by the other.
CREDIT(S)
(L.1963, c. 576, § 1; amended L.1980, c. 281, § 20.)
Executive Order – East Wing Restoration (Speculative)
SUMMARY January 20, 2029 President Orders Removal of Unauthorized State Ballroom and Restoration of the White House East Wing Today, the President signed an Executive Order directing the complete demolition of the recently completed White House State Ballroom and the reconstruction of the historic East Wing. The order restores essential presidential, public, and security functions eliminated by the East Wing’s demolition and affirms that the White House is a national trust held for institutional continuity—not personal legacy. © 2025 Alyce Wittenstein. All Rights Reserved. Project 2029 and all associated text, structure, and policy formulations are original copyrighted works. No portion may be reproduced, adapted, translated, or distributed without express written permission, except for brief quotations [...]
Executive Order – Kennedy Center (Speculative)
SUMMARY January 20, 2029 Today, the President signed an Executive Order restoring the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to its lawful name, memorial status, and independent governance. The Order voids unauthorized renaming actions taken on December 18, 2025, reaffirms congressional intent, and restores the Center as a national cultural institution held in trust for the American people—not as a vehicle for personal or political legacy. FULL EXECUTIVE ORDER TEXT [PASTE YOUR FULL EO TEXT HERE — unchanged] PRESS RELEASE WASHINGTON — The President today signed an Executive Order restoring the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to its proper legal name, memorial status, and governance structure. The Kennedy Center was [...]
Introducing Project 2029
Project 2029 began as a deliberate shift in how I use imagination. More than thirty-five years ago, I made dystopian films that imagined political and social futures shaped by fear, institutional failure, and concentration of power. At the time, those futures felt exaggerated—useful as warnings, but safely distant from reality. Over time, many of the conditions those films explored stopped feeling speculative and began to feel familiar. That experience changed how I think about storytelling and political imagination. If dystopian futures can move from fiction into lived experience, then imagination is not neutral. It shapes what people expect, accept, and resign themselves to. Project 2029 is a conscious decision to move in the opposite direction—to [...]
The Accident Was Minor. The Injury Was Not. Why Low-Impact Car Crashes Still Cause Serious Harm
People tend to describe car accidents using the language of property damage. The car wasn’t totaled. The bumper barely dented. The airbags didn’t deploy. Everyone walked away. And yet, weeks later, the pain arrives. This disconnect—between what a crash looked like and what it did—is one of the most common and most misunderstood issues in New York car accident cases. It is also one of the most aggressively exploited by insurance companies. In Queens, where traffic is dense, speeds are inconsistent, and collisions often occur in close quarters, many crashes fall into the category insurers like to call “minor impact.” The phrase sounds scientific. It isn’t. It’s a financial label, not a medical one. Vehicle Damage [...]
Gravity: CEO Politics
Before Donald Trump turned American politics into corporate spectacle, No Such Thing as Gravity predicted exactly that world: a CEO-in-chief who governs like a brand manager and treats the country like a company. Policies become product launches. Truth becomes marketing copy. Leadership becomes performance. The film’s portrayal of a profit-obsessed leader is disturbingly familiar. Decisions that affect millions are reframed as business calculations. Human lives become numbers on a spreadsheet. This collapse of morality into metrics is the film’s most chilling insight — and its most prophetic. See this prescient political satire at the Spectacle Theater in Brooklyn, part of the Multiple Futures trilogy.
Betaville: Comedy of Capitalism
Most dystopias are grim. Betaville is bright, loud, absurd — and that’s what makes it devastating. Instead of showing us a dark authoritarian future, it reveals the ridiculousness of our own world by pushing capitalist culture to its comedic breaking point. The film’s exaggerated fashion, extravagant characters, and relentless pursuit of trendiness showcase the ways in which capitalism creates arbitrary hierarchies. People compete not for survival, but for relevance. Success isn’t measured in ethics or intelligence, but in visibility—a concept more relevant now than ever in the influencer age. Why does the comedy hurt? Because it’s true. The film exposes the irrationality of capitalist systems that prey on insecurity, reward superficiality, and punish nonconformity. In [...]